Forgot, A crude version of what I can do when thinking is called parametric analysis, look it up on internet, misapplied as to context, but no great matter and cross fertilised with Systems theory. Thinking upon it, it could be that Georges Metanomsky - how does he come by such an allegoric name? - is what may be a mental case of paraplegic? I call it metaphor hopping.
adrian archytas wrote: > The brain stuff I was looking for was about recent empirical work. I > only saw the headline and meant to read up, but the headline had > gone. It was a claim to have found complex activity of multi- > dimensionality. Might be dross, but I'll get to the stuff > eventually. Little work is original and I'm not sure much has shifted > since Richard Gregory was writing Mind and Brain. It has struck me > for a long time that all of us lack much resource other than the first > person reference (phenomenology) and our habitus and we are all stuck > in a form of argument with severe difficulties and interests a long > way from truth-seeking - whatever science models we have seem too > limited and caught up in this. > > On 4 Sep, 23:09, adrf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Georges you don't know ornamental mind from a bar of soap. Besides what do >> you do but copycat >> stuff and pretend it's your own. I've thought maybe the skepdics might be a >> use for you, but >> severely doubt they'd put up with you. I don't know who hurt you, but none >> of us did, so why >> take it out on us? >> >> adrian >> >> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
