Ye gods, It's asking for comments. Somewhat confused, between axiomatics and outdated logic, stuck together borrowed feathers, dunked in epiphenomenal thinking. Does not make its terms clear, like relativistic. Einstein made errors and the recent emerging overhaul of scientific terms has various interpretations because relativity - why a slogging NOUN? - exists but not quite in the sense of time dilation Einstein adduced. You have to prove it exists before you can do that.
NOW Heidegger draws a Distinction between Sein and Dasein, not too well translated int English. So allow me. Sein can be taken as being and existence per se, not unlike Descartes I am, therefore. In Heidegger it's not logic so much as an existential given to explore. Being is complex, as everything seems to have become these days. Dasein is not existence but more like a context without which Daein has little enough to get its teeth into. It's not unlike a no centred universe. IF, as a thought experience, we donate a particle with sentience, then in such a universe the particle can go little further than the "I am" because there's nothing to relate to so as to help it make distinctions. It cannot tell whether it moves or not. Given we introduce a 2nd particle then between the two neither can tell which is moving, only that the distance between is changing. We can increase the number of particles, in a group or en masse, which makes no difference only that the distances between may vary. transcendentally [ are you relying on here, Georges?] And non-epiphenomenally a particle may find, through the intangible 'dark matter' or raw energy and its sentience that it can push pull other particles which for certain collections attain a form. That introduces Dasein. So unless we further and arbitrarily donate the particle with a sensorium, it can hardly detect forms of any kind. So all it will notice then is a kind of action dance it cannot tell as distinct from either random or orderly. It's like an alien, give it a space craft, hanging from, say, St Peter's Square watching people cross it in all directions. Unless the alien donates purpose to those particle there's no sense to be made of the action. But in all this the assembly from singular bits or data of anything whatsoever cannot proceed without an ontology and complexity, which can either be too complex to enumerate, so we can call it random or chaos or simple enough to enumerate in which case we can call it order. THEREFORE, to toss around a bundle of attributes or qualities as you do Georges, make no sense at all unless you begin at a beginning as a causa causorum of action. """Every great and deep difficulty bears in itself its own solution. It forces us to change our thinking in order to find it." Niels Bohr """All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force… We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter. - Max Planck, Planck does not make clear how powerful, encompassing or understanding such a mind is, BUT in order to account for everything in our Dasein, it either has to originate in that mind or be permitted to be created or evolve from whatever crisis in that mind. This last sentence is the subject of a great deal of confused theological thinking I won't go into here. Nor have I gone into potentials and possibilities as is a recent philosophical fad. That's my comment aqnd if you don't like it you may lump it but kindly avoid going into one of your temper tantrums. It won't make any impression at all. Children have to discover in their own right that temper tantrums can be controlled. Of course I could have poured the cooment into half a dozen or more other perspectives. adrian. Georges Metanomski wrote: > > > > --- On Thu, 9/4/08, archytas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:ups.com> > >> I did look up the brain reference Adrian - but didn't >> find what I was >> after. > =============== > Hi Neil, > Have a look at "MIND AND BRAIN" in > http://findgeorges.com/ROOT/RELATIVISTIC_PHENOMENOLOGY/c_mind_and_brain.html > or indirectly: > http://findgeorges.com/ > 1 RELATIVISTIC PHENOMENOLOGY > 1c mind and brain > I'd appreciate your comments. > Georges. > =============== > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
