--- On Sat, 9/13/08, socratus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: socratus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [epistemology 9524] The mad CERN ’s way.
> To: "Epistemology" <[email protected]>
> Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008, 3:18 PM
> This week's startup of Europe's Large Hadron
> Collider didn't generate
> a big bang or a black hole, but it did generate a big
> reaction from
> folks
> who followed our series on the "Big Bang
> Machine."
> More than 40,000 people voiced their opinion by clicking
> through
> our unscientific survey or by discussing the issues in
> online forums.
> Full Story:
> http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/12/1386080.aspx
>
> ===============..
> The mad CERN ’s way.
>
> In 1906, Rutherford studied internal structure of atoms,
> bombarding them with high energy a- particles.
> This idea helped him understand the structure of atom.
> But the clever Devil interfered and gave advice to
> physicists
> to enlarge the target. Bomb them!
> And physicist created huge cannon-accelerators of
> particles.
> And they began to bomb micro particles in the vacuum, in
> hoping
> to understand their inner structure. And they were
> surprised with
> the results of this bombing. Several hundreds of
> completely new
> strange particles appeared. They lived a very little time
> and do not
> relate to our world. Our Earth needs its real constants
> of nature.
> But this was forgotten.
> What God carefully created, is destroyed in accelerators.
> And they are proud of that. They say: we study the inner
> structure
> of the particles. The clever and artful Devil is glad. He
> again has
> deceived man.
> Physicist think, that an accelerator - is first of all the
> presence
> of huge energy.
> And the Devil laughs. He knows, that an accelerator - is
> first of all
> the Vacuum.
> But this, he has withheld from man.
> He has not explained that the Vacuum is infinite and
> inexhaustible.
> And in infinity there is contained an infinite variety of
> particles.
> And by bombing the vacuum, one can find centaurs and
> sphinxes.
> But my God, save us from their presence on Earth.
> ========= .. ========.
> Rutherford was right.
> His followers are mistaken.
> Why?
> Imagine, that I want to plant a small apple- tree.
> For this purpose I shall dig out a hole of 1 meter width
> and 1,20 m
> depth.
> It is normal.
> But if to plant a small apple- tree, I shall begin to dig
> a base for a huge building (skyscraper),
> or if to begin drill ground with 10 km. depth,
> will you call me a normal man?
> ========== .. ===============.
> Imagine a man who breaks watches on the wall.
> And then he tries to understand the mechanism of the
> watches
> by thrown cogwheels, springs and small screws.
> Does he have many chances to succeed?
> As many as the scientists have who aspire to understand
> the inner structure of electron by breaking them into
> accelerators.
> If not take into account the initial conditions of
> Genesis,
> the fantasies of the scientists may be unlimited.
> ========== . ======== .
> The Nature works very economical.
> For example, biologists know 100 ( hundred ) kinds of
> amino acids. But only 20 ( twenty) kinds of amino acids
> are suitable to produce molecules of protein, from which
> all
> different cells created on our planet. What are about
> another
> 80 % of amino acids? They are dead end of evolution.
> The physicists found many ( 1000 ) new elementary particles
> in
> accelerators. But we need only one ( 1) electron and one
> (1 )
> proton to create first atom, to begin to create the
> Nature.
> All another elementary particles (mesons, muons , bosons,
> taus,
> all their girlfriends - antiparticles, all quarks and
> antiquarks…
> etc)
> are dead end of evolution.
> ===========..
> The Universe as whole is Vacuum, first of all.
=============
True! This post is an irrefutable proof.
Georges.
=============
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
