On Sep 16, 9:06 am, socratus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What was before: “ big bang” or vacuum ? > ============. > The physicists created the “ Europe’s Large Hadron Colider “ > Please, look how our physicists made this accelerator. > Before they made vacuum and after they generate big reaction > between two meeting particles, some small imitation of “ big bang”. > They didn’t make this process vice versa. > So, what was before in the Universe: “ big bang” or vacuum ? > ===========================..
A vacuum is "something". There could thus not have been a vacuum only prior to the bang. To introduce variation in the search of focus: There could have been one of two things prior to the bang, something - in other words everything - or nothing. The former would be explained by the fact that there must have been other universes banged into existence from which follows that our particular universe comes from something. The latter would be explained by the fact that there must have been only one big bang and one universe. I state the above in contradiction, since there are various contadictory facts going around in the minds of the beholders, begging better understanding of the word "fact". Keep well Sam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
