Comment by Rick.
Well you know there are some serious problems with the standard model. And well high energy particle physics has been the big budget backbone of physics, and yet the type of physics they engage in, is not the type of physics you see in the every day world. It just doesn't apply to anything other than supercolliders. Giant electro-magnets essentially. It is the physics of giant electro- magnets and so it knows nothing about mass, and everything about what happens in a giant electro-magnet. Now the problem arises when you take what you have done in a giant electro-magnet and try to say that this is how the universe works. No, this is how a giant electro-magnet works. And so then you see people spend hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars trying to make a fusion reactor, based on information from a giant electro-magnet. And all attempts have failed. Not only that, but the recommendations made have been, look, first go back and learn how things work, because clearly you have not got a clue what you are doing, or how atoms work at all, so before you spend another hundred billion dollars on yet another project which shows zero results, perhaps you had better learn some real physics. And that true, because you see you can do experiment after experiment and get absolutely nowhere, if your theory is wrong in the first place. You will just look for results that match your hypothesis, and you will make erroneous conclusions, and you will make further erroneous assumptions, and none of it will be accurate, and none of it will lead to any useful predictions. You know its clear to me, that either the people at the LHC do not know much about atoms, or they are merely playing Devil's Advocate, because they are claiming that they will be sending mass or matter around the collider at almost the speed of light, and special relativity says that to say that you can do that means you know nothing much about physics at all. So then when they send em waves around there they call those particles, and when they send em waves around there they can just make up whatever they want and they just say well energy is the same as mass. But E=mc2 is not about em waves it is F=ma See how it is just renamed? Isn't a cute trick to rename old formulas and everyone will think you are amazing? Like Newton renamed F=ma to w=mg same thing again. So energy equals mass times the speed of light but it is not electro- magnetic energy, it is force. Kinetic energy. Much of physics is about renaming things in a confusing manner in order to make yourself famous. To answer your question about what is the intellect, there is a technical answer such as that your capacity depends on your computers capacity and your software (your brain and your capacity to reason), but there is another answer and that is that intellect is uncommon, common sense. Rick. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
