--- On Sun, 10/5/08, archytas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: archytas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [epistemology 9632] Re: The mad ignorant's way.
> To: "Epistemology" <[email protected]>
> Date: Sunday, October 5, 2008, 12:47 AM
> THe LHC has not yet performed the experiments with lead
> nuclei that
> caused some to fret about black holes. There are plenty of
> arguments
> around that fall into trivialisation.Dialetheism should be
> clearly
> distinguished from trivialism. This is the view that all
> contradictions are true (and hence, assuming that a
> conjunction
> entails its conjuncts, it is also the view that everything
> is true).
> Though a trivialist must be a dialetheist, the converse is
> not the
> case: a dialetheist typically claims that some (and,
> usually, very
> specific) sentences are dialetheias, not that all of them
> are. How one
> can do the former without being committed to the latter is
> one of the
> main topics in the dialetheic theory, since trivialism is
> considered
> by most philosophers theoretically repugnant, if anything
> is. The
> standard solution for the dialetheist consists in
> subscribing to the
> view that entailment (deductively valid inference) is
> paraconsistent.
> Rigourous derivation is needed to avoid trivialisation, as
> I think
> Georges has just pointed out, or else, frankly, we can make
> anything
> mean what it does not and become trivial.
===============
G:
Starting with the Fin-de-Siecle Crisis the Worldview
- based upon the Second Scientific Revolution of the
Extended Relativity - sees the Universe as a structure of
Polar elements - Polarities. Each Polarity is manifested
by two apparently contradictory, but in fact complementary
aspect-poles, eg. continuous wave and discrete photon are
two polar aspects of the polarity "Light".
Old logic of "continuous ORR discrete" is replaced by new
Dialectic "continuous AND discrete".
You may call it "dialetheist", but I don't need highbrow
words as fancy dressing of a simple view.
Georges.
===================
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
