On 5 maio, 17:53, awori achoka <[email protected]> wrote: > No, science did not invent gravity--science stumbled upon the phenomenon in > the laws of nature that we refer to as gravity.
Yes science is just a model, what you refer to gravity is an abstract model, the peheonmenon you "believe" you are referring to is not gravity. > > The phenomenon was already there--but our senses did not have the deductive > capacity to concisely identify and define it. Gravity has nothing to do with our senses, it is an abstract model > > Science is a tool sentient man INVENTED to help him unravel and understand > the mysteries of nature. Science is not an end--it is a means to explore and > discover the myths and character of what is provided by nature---which is > laready there!. > This is partially true, but nature is also a word part of the trick. Nobody of the old mates here can say I'm a scientist, I'm certainly not, but also I am not the contrary position (which is...?) Simply because that geometry is unsatisfactory. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
