Stefan Eilemann wrote: > > > On 14. Jun 2009, at 16:57, gr3go wrote: > >> For 2D and DB configurations the results seems to be acceptable. >> For DPlex, the results are very strange, the performance is not >> increasing >> by increasing the number of stations... > > On a first glance, the config looks ok. Can you post a screenshot of > the statistics? > > > Best, > > Stefan. > > _______________________________________________ > eq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.equalizergraphics.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eq-dev > http://www.equalizergraphics.com > >
Hey, Thanks for your quick response, Stefan. http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/6971/dplex10nodess.jpg Here is a screenshot for a 10 node DPlex config. The initialization took a long time...somewhere around 3 mins.... With other configs it's moving lot more faster.Any ideas why? The model has ~180mb, 5.000.000 vertices and 10.000.000 faces. Regards, Adam -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/performance-measurement-tp2813299p3075985.html Sent from the Equalizer - Parallel Rendering mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ eq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.equalizergraphics.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eq-dev http://www.equalizergraphics.com
