----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
That seems only logical to me, but then you know the FAA, if it's not done exactly like the SB, then you better have something to back it up. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan E Zanutto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 1:41 PM Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH] SB-31 > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > That's exactly what I'm getting at- I will try to find the reference > where it talks about minor deviations when performing ADs- but if you > were to slightly trim the backing plate (put a flat spot on it next to > the rib) or reduce the hole size like you said to 2.5 or 2.75 inches > there would not be a problem. > > 1/2 half inch diameter difference in the hole doesnt prevent the A & P > from doing the inspection, and if you are going that route (cutting > holes) then it's better to have a slightly smaller hole there than no > hole at all because of the oversight on the part of the persons doing the > technical research for writing the SB. > > > JZ > ========================================================================== == == > To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm > Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/ > > > > ========================================================================== ==== To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
