OK.  The numbers sound solid.but the touchdown you quote (60 mph) is
still a bunch faster than a cub, or a taylocraft or a Cessna-150.
 
That's the point I am trying to make.  We lift off and touch down
significantly faster than the other little guys, and that directly
affects the crosswind component we can tolerate.
 
Right?
 
ddw
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:32 PM
To: David Winters; [email protected]
Cc: Geoffrey Davis; John Brier; Allegra Osborn
Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Re: rudder pedals and strong crosswind
landings
 
David
 
I respectfully disagree with you.  We do not (or at least should not)
land as fast as you are recommending in normal conditions.  Slowing down
to 60MPH over the numbers provides for less stress and wear-and-tear on
the aircrafts various systems...tires, brakes, landing gear, steering
assembly, shocks, etc.  Also, landing at the "correct speed" (to be
discussed next) allows us to land on shorter runways and more
importantly allows us to use the published data to determine required
runway length.  Lastly, reducing speed to the correct speed requires
slightly more skill, which keeps our flying proficiency levels up.
 
The published stall speed for a C model is 56MPH (check you POH).  That
being the case, I teach my students to fly around the pattern (entry,
downwind, base) at 80 MPH.  That is usually fast enough not to cause a
traffic jam behind you.  Reduce to 70 MPH when turning final, cross over
the fence (airport boundary) at 65 and touch down at 60.  I tell me
students to remember 80-70-60.
 
Yes, the Ercoupe will touch down and stay down at 80 (or 90 or 100) but
that is not the best way to do it, most of the time.
 
Now, if it is a windy day, I will increase the touch down speed 5,10 or
more MPH, depending on what the wind is doing.   The stronger the winds,
the more speed I will carry.  This provides a cushion in case of wind
shear or sudden reduction of wind on the nose.  If either of these two
situations were to happen (wind reduction or wind shear), at 60MPH the
Ercoupe might stall (mush) as the indicated speed would drop below the
stall speed.  Adding additional speed in this situation creates the
cushion.
 
Glen Davis CFII
Ercoupe N3103H
Grumman Tiger N70GD
 
 
From: David <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Winters 
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:52 PM
To: 'Ed <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Burkhead' ; 'ety'
<mailto:[email protected]>  
Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Re: rudder pedals and strong crosswind
landings
 
Um, yeah, well, OK so my ASI is 10 mph fast.  The point is that we touch
down a bunch faster than the little tail draggers at full stall.  That
lets us handle a much higher cross wind.
Nag nag.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Burkhead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 11:18 AM
To: 'David Winters'; ety
Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Re: rudder pedals and strong crosswind
landings
Dave,
Perhaps you might need to get your airspeed indicator checked.
Yes, I did come down final at 80 indicated before I got my faulty ASI
replaced.  Afterward, with an ASI that checked out to within a mph or
two to actual speed, 70 was a better number and my actual touchdown was
right close to 50.
And yet, the Coupe handles 25+ mph crosswinds just fine in spite of that
terrible, low touchdown speed.
Ed
Ed Burkhead
http://edburkhead.com/Ercoupe/index.htm           East Peoria, Illinois
ed -at- edburk???head.??com                      (remove the ? marks and
change -at- to @)


  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Winters
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 9:05 AM
To: 'fnelson913'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Re: rudder pedals and strong crosswind
landings
A SIGNIFICANT FACTOR of which we seldom speak is the fact that the
largest single contributor to the Coupe crosswind capability is not
crab, nor slip.  It is the fact that the bird comes over the fence at 80
mph and lands not a lot slower.  This, mathematically speaking,
decreases the crosswind component vector effect on the Coupe side
travel.
In other words, over a given distance of travel, a 25 knot crosswind has
half less effect on a bird traveling 80 mph that is does on a bird
traveling 40 mph.
Straight vector analysis.
This can have a major impact on touchdown.  The added benefit of slip
sill not really contribute much.
Dave W
 
Glen
 
 
 
Glen Davis
917 297 1111
www.ishootpictures.com
www.ercoupepilot.com

Reply via email to