Thanks for keeping me honest!

Glen
  From: Hartmut Beil 
  Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 3:30 PM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Re: rudder pedals and strong crosswind landings


  "The published stall speed for a C model is 56MPH (check you POH)"
   
  Actually. 56 Mph is for a 415 model with a gross weight of 1400 lb.
  And 48 Mph for a 415 Model with a gross weight of 1260 lbs.
   
  Published numbers are also:
   
  40 MPH for a gross weight of 1175 lbs and
   
  37 MPH for a gross weight of 1125 lbs and 
   
   
  58 Mph for a gross weight of 1450 lbs ( Forney F1A)
   
   
  So the 415 C keeps flying below 40 MPH when not loaded up to full gross. 
   
  But guy, do not try flying that slow an approach without testing it at high 
altitude.
   
  These numbers require a recently weighted aircraft plus a correct showing 
airspeed instrument.
   
  Who would bet his house on that either the weight in the logbooks and the 
speed shown on the instrument is correct?
   
   
  See my spreadsheet on http://ercoupe.info/index.php/Main/StallSpeeds
   
   
  Hartmut
   




   



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
    CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:32:12 -0500
    Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Re: rudder pedals and strong crosswind landings


    David

    I respectfully disagree with you.  We do not (or at least should not) land 
as fast as you are recommending in normal conditions.  Slowing down to 60MPH 
over the numbers provides for less stress and wear-and-tear on the aircrafts 
various systems...tires, brakes, landing gear, steering assembly, shocks, etc.  
Also, landing at the "correct speed" (to be discussed next) allows us to land 
on shorter runways and more importantly allows us to use the published data to 
determine required runway length.  Lastly, reducing speed to the correct speed 
requires slightly more skill, which keeps our flying proficiency levels up.

    The published stall speed for a C model is 56MPH (check you POH).  That 
being the case, I teach my students to fly around the pattern (entry, downwind, 
base) at 80 MPH.  That is usually fast enough not to cause a traffic jam behind 
you.  Reduce to 70 MPH when turning final, cross over the fence (airport 
boundary) at 65 and touch down at 60.  I tell me students to remember 80-70-60.

    Yes, the Ercoupe will touch down and stay down at 80 (or 90 or 100) but 
that is not the best way to do it, most of the time.

    Now, if it is a windy day, I will increase the touch down speed 5,10 or 
more MPH, depending on what the wind is doing.   The stronger the winds, the 
more speed I will carry.  This provides a cushion in case of wind shear or 
sudden reduction of wind on the nose.  If either of these two situations were 
to happen (wind reduction or wind shear), at 60MPH the Ercoupe might stall 
(mush) as the indicated speed would drop below the stall speed.  Adding 
additional speed in this situation creates the cushion.

    Glen Davis CFII
    Ercoupe N3103H
    Grumman Tiger N70GD


      From: David Winters 
      Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:52 PM
      To: 'Ed Burkhead' ; 'ety' 
      Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Re: rudder pedals and strong crosswind 
landings



      Um, yeah, well, OK so my ASI is 10 mph fast.  The point is that we touch 
down a bunch faster than the little tail draggers at full stall.  That lets us 
handle a much higher cross wind.



      Nag nag.


      Dave


      -----Original Message-----
      From: Ed Burkhead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
      Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 11:18 AM
      To: 'David Winters'; ety
      Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Re: rudder pedals and strong crosswind 
landings



      Dave,


      Perhaps you might need to get your airspeed indicator checked.


      Yes, I did come down final at 80 indicated before I got my faulty ASI 
replaced.  Afterward, with an ASI that checked out to within a mph or two to 
actual speed, 70 was a better number and my actual touchdown was right close to 
50.


      And yet, the Coupe handles 25+ mph crosswinds just fine in spite of that 
terrible, low touchdown speed.


      Ed


      Ed Burkhead

      http://edburkhead.com/Ercoupe/index.htm           East Peoria, Illinois

      ed -at- edburk???head.??com                      (remove the ? marks and 
change -at- to @)




--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
David Winters
      Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 9:05 AM
      To: 'fnelson913'; [email protected]
      Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Re: rudder pedals and strong crosswind 
landings


      A SIGNIFICANT FACTOR of which we seldom speak is the fact that the 
largest single contributor to the Coupe crosswind capability is not crab, nor 
slip.  It is the fact that the bird comes over the fence at 80 mph and lands 
not a lot slower.  This, mathematically speaking, decreases the crosswind 
component vector effect on the Coupe side travel.


      In other words, over a given distance of travel, a 25 knot crosswind has 
half less effect on a bird traveling 80 mph that is does on a bird traveling 40 
mph.


      Straight vector analysis.


      This can have a major impact on touchdown.  The added benefit of slip 
sill not really contribute much.


      Dave W




    Glen



    Glen Davis
    917 297 1111
    www.ishootpictures.com
    www.ercoupepilot.com




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your HotmailĀ®-get your 
"fix". Check it out. 

   
Glen



Glen Davis
917 297 1111
www.ishootpictures.com
www.ercoupepilot.com

Reply via email to