Jerry
I just printed the 80 pages of the NPRM and read it top to bottom. As far as I 
can see, you are safe. They are not touching that. I am happy for you all. I 
can't imagine the grief and loss a PP gets when his / her medical is denied. I 
would go crazy.
Best regards
Eliacim 
 
 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jerry Eichenberger 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Percy 
  Cc: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 3:01 PM
  Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] FAA making changes to Sport Pilot and LSA rules


   

  Is there a link somewhere to the EAA article.

  Any changes coming to restrict those of us who let our medicals just lapse 
rather than trying for a special issuance?

  Jerry E.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 3:38 PM
    To: Percy
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] FAA making changes to Sport Pilot and LSA rules


    Percy,

    Its not funny, its pathetic. I am a sport pilot because all that I want to 
do is fly daytime VFR with my wife, not because of any physical disability.

    I own an Ercoupe that I have completely restored under the eye of an AP/AI. 
I have gone over every inch of that plane in the last eleven months, and know 
all there is to know about a 1946 Ercoupe.

    BUT.... becuase I am a sport pilot and not a private or recreational, I 
cannot even legally change the oil in my plane. What sense does that make? Does 
a private pilot (most of whom rent planes) get some type of specialized 
training in airplane maintenance that sport pilots do not get? NO, they don't.

    Further, if I owned a brand new 100,000 dollar sport plane that is WAY MORE 
complex than the Ercoupe I could take a short class, and I would be allowed to 
do just about any maintenance or repair to the plane.

    The rule lmakes no sense and it really (obivously) ticks me off. Funny? No.

    Unfortunaetly this rule will not change until there are more true sport 
pilots out there (not private flying as sport) and enough people raise their 
voices. Private pilots couldn't care less about the rule or whether it is fair 
or not, unless its something that affects THEM.

    One thing that other 415C, Luscombe, Piper Cub and Aeronca owners need to 
think about is who is the potential buyer of their light sport eligible plane?

    Franlky, knowing what I now know about this rule, I probably would have 
opted for a new LSA or a kit. I would save a small fortune in repairs and 
annuals.

    JMHO.

    Fred
    ---- Percy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

    =============
    Replacing the "10,000-foot MSL" limit for sport pilots with
    "10,000 MSL or 2,000 above ground level (AGL), whichever is higher."

    Hot Sox! The Lid's off!! I hit over 11,000 in my `coupe just going
    part way across the state.

    Percy in NM, USA (home field elevation 3,666)

    Regarding taking care of your Classic Sport Pilot Aircraft (like the
    Ercoupe). It is another anomaiy in the regs. Preventive maintenance
    can be done by a Private Pilot or higher to a Certificated Aircraft. 
    Sport pilot is out, unless you built the plane then you get the
    repairmans certificate for that particular airframe only. Most Sport
    Pilots now are transitioning from Private Pilots and greater. Just
    because they FLY under Sport Pilot, they can FIX their plane under
    Private Pilot. Funny, I know... :-)




   

Reply via email to