David Weinshenker wrote: > Randall Clague wrote: >>We did it that way previously, yes. We need in the future to arm the >>pyro remotely, and the sooner we make that change, the better. > > Feature request noted... it's going to add _significant_ complexity, since > the status indicators will need to be remoted as well, and we will need > an on-borar electronic latching circuit controlling the arming relay, for > reliability.
In that case, would it make more sense just to concentrate on getting POGO working so we can dispense with the pyro entirely? _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
