Adrian Tymes wrote: > David Weinshenker wrote: > > Randall Clague wrote: > > > We did it that way previously, yes. We need in the future to arm the > > > pyro remotely, and the sooner we make that change, the better. > > Feature request noted... it's going to add _significant_ complexity, since > > the status indicators will need to be remoted as well, and we will need > > an on-board electronic latching circuit controlling the arming relay, for > > reliability. > In that case, would it make more sense just to concentrate on getting > POGO working so we can dispense with the pyro entirely?
And abandon the KISS/Spike development stream? -dave w _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
