Ian Woollard wrote:
 
> There's also the Russian N-1 'moon' rocket as a datapoint. It had:
> 
>    1. 30 NK-33 LOX/kerosene engines; 10.1 million lb. total thrust.
>    2. 8 NK-43 LOX/kerosene engines; 3.1 million lb. total thrust.
>    3. 4 NK-39 engines; 360,800 lb. total thrust.
>    4. 1 NK-31 engine; 90,200 lb. thrust; trans-lunar boost stage.
>    5. 1 engine; 19,200 lb. thrust; lunar orbit insertion & initial lunar
>       descent stage.
> 
> They NEVER managed to launch it successfully ;-)
> 
> I include it as an example of what you have to start to worry about if 
> go with a lot more engines.
> 
> (The biggest problems they had was that their turbopumps weren't able to 
> spool up quickly enough to keep the rocket pointing in the right 
> direction, all those engines basically guaranteed multiple failures, and 
> the system that detects engine failures tended to shut down the wrong 
> engine... leaving that engine on fire, and so with a LOX supply- ouch.)
> 
> Based on the Russian experience I think I would vote for having less 
> than 44 engines ;-)

That's like saying "based on the experience of the Edsel, you can't
manufacture cars in America". We've learned a lot about multiple
engines from the days of the N-1 and we're not planning anything of
the complexity and size of that. Multiple identical engines, better
propellants, no turbo pumps, much better sensors and computers, and 
better testing - not to mention not having Kruschev breathing down 
our backs with the threat of Golag) should make for a much more usable 
design than the N-1. We may not be able to get it to work, but the 
advantages offered make it worth trying.

    Michael

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Wallis   KF6SPF       (408) 396-9037        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
President, Wallis International                  http://www.wallis.com

Jay Cuccia: 
"The secret to a happy marriage is to live each day as if it were your
 last, but each night as if it were your first."
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to