On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 17:29:01 -0700 (PDT), Michael Wallis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I suspect you're right. I hope you're wrong. Something like an
>> exponential progression is essential to ERPS getting into orbit in
>> less than a decade. In this case, that's the question Alex asked.
>
>I suspect you mean in the second decade. Some of us have been around a
>while. 8-)
Same same. I meant in a decade from now.
Besides, you can't claim ERPS is a decade old -yet-. :-) Next
February.
(Gawd. It has *not* been that long, because I am *not* that old.
That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
-R
--
"Sutton is the beginning of wisdom -
but only the beginning."
-- Jeff Greason
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
