For someone that just burned through a $4000 radiative chamber, I am a 
happy camper.

We tested our fourth generation kerosene injector tonight.  There will be 
pictures in this weekend's update, but basically it has an even tighter 
venturi, down to 0.6" (with a 0.5" throat), and instead of the fuel coming 
in as a high velocity jet from the side of the venturi, a stainless pipe 
comes in from the outside on the catalyst pack side of the venturi, and it 
has a pretty sizable hole in the bottom, before a plugged end.  The idea is 
to have very low velocity fuel stream straight down the middle of the very 
high velocity (nearly sonic) peroxide decomposition, much like an SSME lox 
post injector in reverse.

We put the radiative chamber together with the high temperature bolts, the 
stainless clamp ring, and the silica gasket material (not the gas-filled 
O-rings, which have yet to arrive). We also wet sanded the silicide coated 
flange, and used a torque wrench to evenly tighten the flange to 6 ft-lb on 
each of the #10 socket head cap screws.  All of the runs sealed absolutely 
perfectly.

We started off very rich (but not as rich as we were running the regen 
engine), and immediately on lighting, it was obvious things were working a 
lot better, because the engine started glowing much more rapidly, and much 
higher up.  There was still a visible bias opposite the fuel inlet, 
probably because the flow had enough momentum that it was not "turned" 
completely axially when it came out of the drilled hole.

Our oxidizer-only Isp was 246, up from a previous best of 192!  We shrank 
the fuel jet a good chunk, and the oxidizer-Isp increased a bit more.  We 
shrank it some more, and it finally nosed over a bit, which would still be 
at increasing "true Isp".

We will have to get our sight glass hooked back up so we can measure the 
kerosene flow, but this was with an 0.040" kerosene jet, while a 0.060" jet 
resulted in a measured O:F of 2.2:1 on Saturday, so that would put us 
around 5:1 O:F, which would be a true Isp of 208!

We will have to check the load cell calibration and more precisely measure 
the kerosene flow, but it was clearly a huge improvement.

Thrust was 45 lbf +/- 5% at 250 psi feed pressure.

We have great video of all these tests, including it throwing molten glass 
beads off of our cinder block blast deflector.  The entire chamber is 
glowing like a star, flaring so you can't see the outline in the video.

We loaded up four liters of peroxide and let it run.  The burn was nice and 
monotonous, but after 45 seconds of hot fire, the plume started deflecting 
slightly, and some sparks started coming off the nozzle.  I killed the 
kerosene, and let the rest run out as monoprop.

We burned the silicide coating off at the nozzle, which allowed the TZM to 
vaporize a hole.  The entire side opposite the fuel fitting has a different 
look to the coating, so I am going to send it back to Hitemco to have them 
tell us some things about it, and have the second chamber coated.  We are 
going to resolve the bias towards one side, possibly improve our film 
cooling, and stay a bit richer.

We may be near the theoretical max Isp (220 at a leaner mixture), but we 
wanted to get rid of the uneven combustion, so we modified the fuel 
injector tube to actually take a 90 degree turn (cut, bend, weld), instead 
of having a hole drilled in the side.  This will give straighter, and even 
lower velocity fuel injection.  We won't be able to "see" the difference 
until we get the second chamber coated, but we are going to test it with 
the regen engine (at a much richer jetting) this weekend.  I have a good 
ring of film "cooling" steam holes in the injector, but I may make a ring 
on the bottom to turn them into a sheet instead of multiple jets.  We may 
have problems with regen cooling, because the greatly increased efficiency 
will have increased the chamber temperature and decreased the peroxide flow.

We are laying out the work for a 1000lbf regen biprop now.

John Carmack

_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to