On 28 Oct 2002 21:34:28 -0800, "Sean R. Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Because silver melts above 85-90%, electrical heating significantly >increases the range of catalysts available to us, and because we're >eventually going to need to deal with the problem A commercial venture that wants to operate year round will need to heat the tanks to keep the peroxide from freezing. Heating the peroxide as a performance enhancement strikes me as unwise. It may be necessary in the future - we don't know - but it isn't yet. We don't need to borrow problems to solve; we have plenty. >unless you're >planning on dropping peroxide in favor of LOX? Eventually, yes. Peroxide is expensive and always will be. When we reach an activity level such that a quarter of our operating cost is peroxide, it will be time to start looking really hard at LOX. It may well be that LOX headaches are no worse than peroxide headaches, but are cheaper. -R -- "...And the last thing I remember is asking, 'What could go wrong?'" _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
