On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:16:54 -0800 (PST), Michael Wallis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Randall? Can we set up the "experiment" again with the same propellant >load and see if we get the same results? Not really. We have 13 liters of known good peroxide left. That's enough to duplicate the problem on the test stand, and maybe test one prospective fix. If we could easily flight test every weekend, and produce many liters of rocket grade peroxide on demand, I would agree that we should refly KISS III exactly as last flown, to try to duplicate the problem. Given the time and expense of a trip to MTA, though, I think we're better served by trying to duplicate the problem on the test stand. Assuming we can, we can fix the problem until it goes away, then we flight test the fixes. In SW devp terms, shipping is expensive enough that RRTS is QA, and MTA is beta test. -R -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The only time an aircraft has too much fuel on board is when it is on fire." -Sir Charles Kingsford Smith _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
