Yes; I wasn't suggesting supersonic flight.Unfortunately, a flyback booster almost certainly wants to cruise back at subsonic speed.
Ramjets work poorly below Mach 1.They're not that bad at about mach 0.85 or so, particularly for a point design which is all you'd need here.
Yes, but it's an unmanned flyback booster, not a transport vehicle.Stir in the availability of turbofans off the shelf, and the desirability of powered landings for operational transport vehicles,
and ramjets don'tOn the other side of the coin, the thrust:weight ratio is not that bad, you only need enough thrust to hold an altitude for a couple of hundred kilometers, and you may even be able to use it on the way up too (for a small amount of the flight envelope), they have no moving parts, they're more reliable, need much less maintenance, and are cheaper to build/buy than a turbojet.
look very attractive for this.
I'm not saying they're theoretically as good as a turbojet; but quite a bit of the cost of a launch vehicle is in the purchase of the said launch vehicle and jets cost a whole lot more. Fuel is the cheap bit. I'd bet dollars to donuts that it's more cost effective in this case.
Henry Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
