On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Jorge Chamorro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El 15/09/2008, a las 22:32, Jon Zeppieri escribió:
>
>>> IOW, could we have instead a ('standalone') 'callee' property (that
>>> isn't to be innocently passed on) ?
>>>
>>
>> ...as a property of what?
>
> The activation object of the execution context.
>Don't even get me started on activation 'objects'... Mark, didn't you propose eliminating that language from the spec? (Yup. https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2008-April/006062.html) I'm guessing that's not actually happening for ES3.1. -Jon _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
