On Sep 16, 2008, at 12:21 AM, liorean wrote:
> 2008/9/16 William Edney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Could I do an assignment of the handler? Sure, but syntactically
>> suboptimal, IMHO.
>
> Once JScript has fixed the function name scope bug, you could use
>
> myElem.addEventListener(
> 'click',
> function f(){
> doSomething();
> this.removeEventListener(
> 'click',
> f,
> false);},
> false);
Or to work around the JScript bug:
(function () {
function f(){
doSomething();
this.removeEventListener('click', f, false);
}
myElem.addEventListener('click', f, false);
})();
Lots of workarounds, none free, but still possibly tolerable or even
not measurable in performance and memory costs.
In case anyone missed it,
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:stack_inspection
Ignore the type parameter and annotations, to see the essential
proposal.
/be
_______________________________________________
Es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
