As it turns out, my suggestion above had already been used (at least) once before—Allen marked the destructuring proposal similarly. I've gone ahead and updated the following:
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:spread http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:rest_parameters http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:destructuring http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:weak_maps http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:simple_maps_and_sets http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:arrow_function_syntax http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:iterators http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:generators http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:generator_expressions http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:array_comprehensions http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:object_literals http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:maximally_minimal_classes http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:quasis ...to all reflect the same consistent message and linkage to the draft spec and bugzilla pages. Rick On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Rick Waldron <[email protected]>wrote: > It doesn't seem reasonable to maintain two versions of the proposals as > they become specifications. > > My first thought is that the simplest possible strategy is to update > harmony proposal pages (on the wiki) with a line at the top that indicates > that the proposal is now in the spec draft. This is low effort-cost to > convey that everyone should be looking at the latest and greatest of each > proposal as they become part of the ES6 draft revisions and progress > towards finalization therein. > > > Rick > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thaddee Tyl wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Domenic Denicola >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Dude, do you even read the spec? >>>> >>>> http://people.mozilla.org/~**jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-**15.14.5.4<http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-15.14.5.4> >>>> >>> >>> So this is just the wiki lacking some updates? >>> >>> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/**doku.php?id=harmony:simple_**maps_and_sets<http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:simple_maps_and_sets> >>> >> >> Yes. >> >> The wiki will lag the spec. I think it may pay to update the wiki, but >> it's unlikely everyone will do this diligently (cc'ing rwaldron in case he >> is motivated in this forEach case). So: always check Allen's latest draft. >> It trumps the wiki, unless there's a bug (and it may be hard to know >> without reading es-discuss or just asking here, cc'ing Allen). >> >> /be >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> >> > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
