Cool, check this: https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2013-January/028270.html :)
That's not all of them, but I'll go through it all again for anything I missed (unless you want to list any here, which would be fantastic) Rick On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:08 PM, David Bruant <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 18/01/2013 18:58, Rick Waldron a écrit : > >> It doesn't seem reasonable to maintain two versions of the proposals as >> they become specifications. >> >> My first thought is that the simplest possible strategy is to update >> harmony proposal pages (on the wiki) with a line at the top that indicates >> that the proposal is now in the spec draft. This is low effort-cost to >> convey that everyone should be looking at the latest and greatest of each >> proposal as they become part of the ES6 draft revisions and progress >> towards finalization therein. >> > I fully agree. It'll bring more attention to what happens in the drafts > and will make more people to review them. > Also, if something in the harmony namespace is put on hold like > harmony:classes it should probably be downgraded to the strawman namespace. > > David >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
