On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Jul 19, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Andreas Rossberg wrote: > > > On 18 July 2013 18:16, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > >> In fact, the > >> conclusion/resolution doesn't even say that Symbols will be primitive > >> values. All of the bullet items listed there are apply equally to > either > >> symbols as primitives or symbols as exotic objects. The current (and > >> previous, I believe) spec. draft reflects those explicit conclusions. > > > > Ah, come on. That was the main point of the proposal, and it's > > explicit at the beginning of the notes. It was clear to everybody in > > the room, including you. You went to adopt it in the spec, after all. > > Oh, I agree with that. I was just making a point that the minutes aren't > always a very reliable record of a discussion. And that's not meant as a > criticism of Rick or Arv or anybody else who takes notes. I couldn't do it > half as well as they do. > > Apologies for any ambiguity in the notes—I should've reiterated in the Conclusion/Resolution, but I distinctly remember that Andreas's proposal to make Symbols a new primitive was indeed accepted. Rick
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
