A discussion on legal-discuss pointed me to this discussion about dual licensing, interesting to read: http://markmail.org/thread/b46v73m6thhm5zw4
/Anne On 29. jan. 2010, at 20.03, Richard Hirsch wrote: > We probably have to clean up the JQuery-related script files any way - > get the most recent version, etc. > > D. > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: >> As Bertrand mentioned in the first post in this thread, this is >> probably the way to go... >> >> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since JQuery is MIT licensed, why can't we just include it (unchanged) >>> in the distribution as third-party code? >>> >>> Ethan >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Looks cool. Thanks. >>>> >>>> Only problem is that I didn't find a maven repoistory with the JQuery >>>> files. >>>> >>>> On 1/29/10, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Re: maven-soultion, I was thinking about JQuery stuff. If its MIT >>>>>> license is ok, then we just have to see the instructions on dealing >>>>>> with third party works.... >>>>> >>>>> Ok, in Sling we have a similar case with dojo, and what we do is >>>>> download it at build time, and store in a local cache for future >>>>> builds. >>>>> >>>>> See the "Dynamically download the Dojo Toolkit" bit in >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/trunk/contrib/extensions/dojo/pom.xml >>>>> >>>>> -Bertrand >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
