Just finished cleaning up our SVN. Added licenses where needed and threw out files that weren't used. I added the latest rat listing to the JIRA item. We currently just have two files with a licensing issue:
!????? src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-ui-1.7.2.custom.min.js !????? src/main/webapp/style/smoothness/jquery-ui-1.7.2.custom.css Both have the dual licensing: /* * jQuery UI 1.7.2 * * Copyright (c) 2009 AUTHORS.txt (http://jqueryui.com/about) * Dual licensed under the MIT (MIT-LICENSE.txt) * and GPL (GPL-LICENSE.txt) licenses. * * http://docs.jquery.com/UI */ I looked at the thread that Anne mentioned and didn't really find a final decision. @mentors: any suggestions I did some quick testing in the UI. Maybe others can test with the latest code drop to se if anything else is broken. D. On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > A discussion on legal-discuss pointed me to this discussion about dual > licensing, interesting to read: > http://markmail.org/thread/b46v73m6thhm5zw4 > > /Anne > > On 29. jan. 2010, at 20.03, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >> We probably have to clean up the JQuery-related script files any way - >> get the most recent version, etc. >> >> D. >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> As Bertrand mentioned in the first post in this thread, this is >>> probably the way to go... >>> >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Since JQuery is MIT licensed, why can't we just include it (unchanged) >>>> in the distribution as third-party code? >>>> >>>> Ethan >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Looks cool. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> Only problem is that I didn't find a maven repoistory with the JQuery >>>>> files. >>>>> >>>>> On 1/29/10, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Re: maven-soultion, I was thinking about JQuery stuff. If its MIT >>>>>>> license is ok, then we just have to see the instructions on dealing >>>>>>> with third party works.... >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok, in Sling we have a similar case with dojo, and what we do is >>>>>> download it at build time, and store in a local cache for future >>>>>> builds. >>>>>> >>>>>> See the "Dynamically download the Dojo Toolkit" bit in >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/trunk/contrib/extensions/dojo/pom.xml >>>>>> >>>>>> -Bertrand >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> > >
