Thanks Joe. I committed the changes now. /Anne
On 8. feb. 2010, at 11.05, Joe Schaefer wrote: > ----- Original Message ---- > >> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Sun, February 7, 2010 7:24:04 PM >> Subject: Re: LGPL code in ESME (was: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" ...) >> >> Joe, >> >> Isn't the LICENSE file only for the Apache License? > > No. It's a file that should contain copies of ALL licenses in > your overall distribution/eventual release. > >> Shouldn't we create a MIT-LICENSE.txt file as the copyright states? >> * Copyright (c) 2009 AUTHORS.txt (http://jqueryui.com/about) >> * Licensed under the MIT (MIT-LICENSE.txt) license. > > I haven't looked at where this stuff is located in ESME's svn tree, > but there should probably be such a file alongside the jquery source > file(s). That doesn't change the fact that the LICENSE file > at the base of the ESME distribution gets a copy of it as well. > >> >> /Anne >> >> >> On 5. feb. 2010, at 19.08, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> >>> With 3rd party works, you don't move the copyright notices. >>> You copy them, along with the license, into the LICENSE file. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ---- >>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Fri, February 5, 2010 9:51:16 AM >>>> Subject: Re: LGPL code in ESME (was: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" ...) >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> For the two files with dual licensing you just leave the MIT in and remove >> the >>>> GPL. >>>> Quote from the legal-discuss thread: >>>> "Ans: When including that work's licensing, state which license is being >>>> used >> >>>> and include only the license that you have chosen." >>>> >>>> Now my next question would be if we can move those copyright notices to >>>> the >>>> NOTICE file? >>>> >>>> /Anne >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5. feb. 2010, at 15.27, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>> >>>>> Just finished cleaning up our SVN. >>>>> >>>>> Added licenses where needed and threw out files that weren't used. I >>>>> added the latest rat listing to the JIRA item. We currently just have >>>>> two files with a licensing issue: >>>>> >>>>> !????? src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-ui-1.7.2.custom.min.js >>>>> !????? src/main/webapp/style/smoothness/jquery-ui-1.7.2.custom.css >>>>> >>>>> Both have the dual licensing: >>>>> >>>>> /* >>>>> * jQuery UI 1.7.2 >>>>> * >>>>> * Copyright (c) 2009 AUTHORS.txt (http://jqueryui.com/about) >>>>> * Dual licensed under the MIT (MIT-LICENSE.txt) >>>>> * and GPL (GPL-LICENSE.txt) licenses. >>>>> * >>>>> * http://docs.jquery.com/UI >>>>> */ >>>>> >>>>> I looked at the thread that Anne mentioned and didn't really find a >>>>> final decision. >>>>> >>>>> @mentors: any suggestions >>>>> >>>>> I did some quick testing in the UI. Maybe others can test with the >>>>> latest code drop to se if anything else is broken. >>>>> >>>>> D. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> A discussion on legal-discuss pointed me to this discussion about dual >>>> licensing, interesting to read: >>>>>> http://markmail.org/thread/b46v73m6thhm5zw4 >>>>>> >>>>>> /Anne >>>>>> >>>>>> On 29. jan. 2010, at 20.03, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We probably have to clean up the JQuery-related script files any way - >>>>>>> get the most recent version, etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> D. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Richard Hirsch >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> As Bertrand mentioned in the first post in this thread, this is >>>>>>>> probably the way to go... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Ethan Jewett wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Since JQuery is MIT licensed, why can't we just include it (unchanged) >>>>>>>>> in the distribution as third-party code? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ethan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Richard Hirsch >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Looks cool. Thanks. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Only problem is that I didn't find a maven repoistory with the >>>>>>>>>> JQuery >>>> files. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/10, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Richard Hirsch >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Re: maven-soultion, I was thinking about JQuery stuff. If its MIT >>>>>>>>>>>> license is ok, then we just have to see the instructions on dealing >>>>>>>>>>>> with third party works.... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ok, in Sling we have a similar case with dojo, and what we do is >>>>>>>>>>> download it at build time, and store in a local cache for future >>>>>>>>>>> builds. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> See the "Dynamically download the Dojo Toolkit" bit in >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/trunk/contrib/extensions/dojo/pom.xml >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -Bertrand >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > >
