With 3rd party works, you don't move the copyright notices. You copy them, along with the license, into the LICENSE file.
----- Original Message ---- > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Fri, February 5, 2010 9:51:16 AM > Subject: Re: LGPL code in ESME (was: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" ...) > > Thanks! > > For the two files with dual licensing you just leave the MIT in and remove > the > GPL. > Quote from the legal-discuss thread: > "Ans: When including that work's licensing, state which license is being used > and include only the license that you have chosen." > > Now my next question would be if we can move those copyright notices to the > NOTICE file? > > /Anne > > > On 5. feb. 2010, at 15.27, Richard Hirsch wrote: > > > Just finished cleaning up our SVN. > > > > Added licenses where needed and threw out files that weren't used. I > > added the latest rat listing to the JIRA item. We currently just have > > two files with a licensing issue: > > > > !????? src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-ui-1.7.2.custom.min.js > > !????? src/main/webapp/style/smoothness/jquery-ui-1.7.2.custom.css > > > > Both have the dual licensing: > > > > /* > > * jQuery UI 1.7.2 > > * > > * Copyright (c) 2009 AUTHORS.txt (http://jqueryui.com/about) > > * Dual licensed under the MIT (MIT-LICENSE.txt) > > * and GPL (GPL-LICENSE.txt) licenses. > > * > > * http://docs.jquery.com/UI > > */ > > > > I looked at the thread that Anne mentioned and didn't really find a > > final decision. > > > > @mentors: any suggestions > > > > I did some quick testing in the UI. Maybe others can test with the > > latest code drop to se if anything else is broken. > > > > D. > > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > > wrote: > >> A discussion on legal-discuss pointed me to this discussion about dual > licensing, interesting to read: > >> http://markmail.org/thread/b46v73m6thhm5zw4 > >> > >> /Anne > >> > >> On 29. jan. 2010, at 20.03, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >> > >>> We probably have to clean up the JQuery-related script files any way - > >>> get the most recent version, etc. > >>> > >>> D. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Richard Hirsch > wrote: > >>>> As Bertrand mentioned in the first post in this thread, this is > >>>> probably the way to go... > >>>> > >>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Ethan Jewett wrote: > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> Since JQuery is MIT licensed, why can't we just include it (unchanged) > >>>>> in the distribution as third-party code? > >>>>> > >>>>> Ethan > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Richard Hirsch > wrote: > >>>>>> Looks cool. Thanks. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Only problem is that I didn't find a maven repoistory with the JQuery > files. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 1/29/10, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Richard Hirsch > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Re: maven-soultion, I was thinking about JQuery stuff. If its MIT > >>>>>>>> license is ok, then we just have to see the instructions on dealing > >>>>>>>> with third party works.... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ok, in Sling we have a similar case with dojo, and what we do is > >>>>>>> download it at build time, and store in a local cache for future > >>>>>>> builds. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> See the "Dynamically download the Dojo Toolkit" bit in > >>>>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/trunk/contrib/extensions/dojo/pom.xml > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -Bertrand > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >>
