----- Original Message ---- > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sun, February 7, 2010 7:24:04 PM > Subject: Re: LGPL code in ESME (was: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" ...) > > Joe, > > Isn't the LICENSE file only for the Apache License?
No. It's a file that should contain copies of ALL licenses in your overall distribution/eventual release. > Shouldn't we create a MIT-LICENSE.txt file as the copyright states? > * Copyright (c) 2009 AUTHORS.txt (http://jqueryui.com/about) > * Licensed under the MIT (MIT-LICENSE.txt) license. I haven't looked at where this stuff is located in ESME's svn tree, but there should probably be such a file alongside the jquery source file(s). That doesn't change the fact that the LICENSE file at the base of the ESME distribution gets a copy of it as well. > > /Anne > > > On 5. feb. 2010, at 19.08, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > With 3rd party works, you don't move the copyright notices. > > You copy them, along with the license, into the LICENSE file. > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > >> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >> To: [email protected] > >> Sent: Fri, February 5, 2010 9:51:16 AM > >> Subject: Re: LGPL code in ESME (was: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" ...) > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> For the two files with dual licensing you just leave the MIT in and remove > the > >> GPL. > >> Quote from the legal-discuss thread: > >> "Ans: When including that work's licensing, state which license is being > >> used > > >> and include only the license that you have chosen." > >> > >> Now my next question would be if we can move those copyright notices to > >> the > >> NOTICE file? > >> > >> /Anne > >> > >> > >> On 5. feb. 2010, at 15.27, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >> > >>> Just finished cleaning up our SVN. > >>> > >>> Added licenses where needed and threw out files that weren't used. I > >>> added the latest rat listing to the JIRA item. We currently just have > >>> two files with a licensing issue: > >>> > >>> !????? src/main/webapp/scripts/jquery-ui-1.7.2.custom.min.js > >>> !????? src/main/webapp/style/smoothness/jquery-ui-1.7.2.custom.css > >>> > >>> Both have the dual licensing: > >>> > >>> /* > >>> * jQuery UI 1.7.2 > >>> * > >>> * Copyright (c) 2009 AUTHORS.txt (http://jqueryui.com/about) > >>> * Dual licensed under the MIT (MIT-LICENSE.txt) > >>> * and GPL (GPL-LICENSE.txt) licenses. > >>> * > >>> * http://docs.jquery.com/UI > >>> */ > >>> > >>> I looked at the thread that Anne mentioned and didn't really find a > >>> final decision. > >>> > >>> @mentors: any suggestions > >>> > >>> I did some quick testing in the UI. Maybe others can test with the > >>> latest code drop to se if anything else is broken. > >>> > >>> D. > >>> > >>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>> wrote: > >>>> A discussion on legal-discuss pointed me to this discussion about dual > >> licensing, interesting to read: > >>>> http://markmail.org/thread/b46v73m6thhm5zw4 > >>>> > >>>> /Anne > >>>> > >>>> On 29. jan. 2010, at 20.03, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> We probably have to clean up the JQuery-related script files any way - > >>>>> get the most recent version, etc. > >>>>> > >>>>> D. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Richard Hirsch > >> wrote: > >>>>>> As Bertrand mentioned in the first post in this thread, this is > >>>>>> probably the way to go... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Ethan Jewett wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Since JQuery is MIT licensed, why can't we just include it (unchanged) > >>>>>>> in the distribution as third-party code? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ethan > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Richard Hirsch > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Looks cool. Thanks. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Only problem is that I didn't find a maven repoistory with the > >>>>>>>> JQuery > >> files. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 1/29/10, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Richard Hirsch > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Re: maven-soultion, I was thinking about JQuery stuff. If its MIT > >>>>>>>>>> license is ok, then we just have to see the instructions on dealing > >>>>>>>>>> with third party works.... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Ok, in Sling we have a similar case with dojo, and what we do is > >>>>>>>>> download it at build time, and store in a local cache for future > >>>>>>>>> builds. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> See the "Dynamically download the Dojo Toolkit" bit in > >>>>>>>>> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/trunk/contrib/extensions/dojo/pom.xml > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -Bertrand > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
