I think we should really limit our focus for Jira items that are in releases. When a JIRA item is included in a release (rather than the backlog), I take that to mean that we will not release until that item is addressed. If we will release without an item being addressed, I think it should stay in the backlog, or be scheduled for a different (future) release. Is that how others understand it? Maybe not :-)
With that understanding, I think we need to decide if the UI or LDAP support is higher priority (or if they are equal). If LDAP is as important as the UI, let's put it in the 1.1 release. If it's not, let's move it to the backlog or to a 1.2 release (and put off moving to Lift 2.0 until that point). Ethan On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > I just noticed that "Add LDAP to ESME" is a Jira task tagged for the 1.1 > release. > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135) > Then I would say yes let's use the Lift 2.0 snapshot. > > On 18. mars 2010, at 05.03, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >> 1.1 with UI >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Which release do you refer to as next? >>> If RC2 I'd say no. >>> >>> - anne >>> >>> >>> On 17. mars 2010, at 13.22, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>> >>>> Do we want to use the 2.0 snapshot for the next release? We would get >>> LDAP >>>> support which is now part of the current snapshot? >>>> >>>> Maybe someone can try it out in a branch.... >>>> >>>> Last time I checked, there were breaking changes... >>>> >>>> D. >>> >>> > >
