Let's say that the UI + LDAP + bug fixes are the focus for the next release. Everything else goes into the backlog.
D. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]>wrote: > > On 18. mars 2010, at 14.21, Ethan Jewett wrote: > > > I think we should really limit our focus for Jira items that are in > > releases. When a JIRA item is included in a release (rather than the > > backlog), I take that to mean that we will not release until that item > > is addressed. If we will release without an item being addressed, I > > think it should stay in the backlog, or be scheduled for a different > > (future) release. Is that how others understand it? Maybe not :-) > > > +1 > For the next .point releases I think it is good if we didn't take too much > water over our heads. > > > With that understanding, I think we need to decide if the UI or LDAP > > support is higher priority (or if they are equal). If LDAP is as > > important as the UI, let's put it in the 1.1 release. If it's not, > > let's move it to the backlog or to a 1.2 release (and put off moving > > to Lift 2.0 until that point). > > LDAP support is important. > I know we missed a few opportunities last year because we didn't support > it, so I would like to keep it in release 1.1 > +1 > > > > > Ethan > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I just noticed that "Add LDAP to ESME" is a Jira task tagged for the 1.1 > release. > >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135) > >> Then I would say yes let's use the Lift 2.0 snapshot. > >> > >> On 18. mars 2010, at 05.03, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >> > >>> 1.1 with UI > >>> > >>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>> <[email protected]>wrote: > >>> > >>>> Which release do you refer to as next? > >>>> If RC2 I'd say no. > >>>> > >>>> - anne > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 17. mars 2010, at 13.22, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Do we want to use the 2.0 snapshot for the next release? We would get > >>>> LDAP > >>>>> support which is now part of the current snapshot? > >>>>> > >>>>> Maybe someone can try it out in a branch.... > >>>>> > >>>>> Last time I checked, there were breaking changes... > >>>>> > >>>>> D. > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
