I have tried to follow that discussion as best I could too. If we start to use it, it might also speed things up a bit. There is nothing better for a developer than seeing his work being implemented and used :-)
- anne On 18. mars 2010, at 19.24, Richard Hirsch wrote: > Based on what I've seen on the lift mailing list, the LDAP support in lift > is still in its early stages but it should still provide an excellent start > for us. > > D. > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't really have an opinion about LDAP aside from thinking that we >> need it. I definitely support this approach. >> >> Ethan >> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Let's say that the UI + LDAP + bug fixes are the focus for the next >> release. >>> Everything else goes into the backlog. >>> >>> D. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 18. mars 2010, at 14.21, Ethan Jewett wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think we should really limit our focus for Jira items that are in >>>>> releases. When a JIRA item is included in a release (rather than the >>>>> backlog), I take that to mean that we will not release until that item >>>>> is addressed. If we will release without an item being addressed, I >>>>> think it should stay in the backlog, or be scheduled for a different >>>>> (future) release. Is that how others understand it? Maybe not :-) >>>>> >>>> +1 >>>> For the next .point releases I think it is good if we didn't take too >> much >>>> water over our heads. >>>> >>>>> With that understanding, I think we need to decide if the UI or LDAP >>>>> support is higher priority (or if they are equal). If LDAP is as >>>>> important as the UI, let's put it in the 1.1 release. If it's not, >>>>> let's move it to the backlog or to a 1.2 release (and put off moving >>>>> to Lift 2.0 until that point). >>>> >>>> LDAP support is important. >>>> I know we missed a few opportunities last year because we didn't support >>>> it, so I would like to keep it in release 1.1 >>>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ethan >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> I just noticed that "Add LDAP to ESME" is a Jira task tagged for the >> 1.1 >>>> release. >>>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135) >>>>>> Then I would say yes let's use the Lift 2.0 snapshot. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 18. mars 2010, at 05.03, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> 1.1 with UI >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which release do you refer to as next? >>>>>>>> If RC2 I'd say no. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - anne >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 17. mars 2010, at 13.22, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do we want to use the 2.0 snapshot for the next release? We would >> get >>>>>>>> LDAP >>>>>>>>> support which is now part of the current snapshot? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe someone can try it out in a branch.... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Last time I checked, there were breaking changes... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> D. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
