On 18. mars 2010, at 14.21, Ethan Jewett wrote: > I think we should really limit our focus for Jira items that are in > releases. When a JIRA item is included in a release (rather than the > backlog), I take that to mean that we will not release until that item > is addressed. If we will release without an item being addressed, I > think it should stay in the backlog, or be scheduled for a different > (future) release. Is that how others understand it? Maybe not :-) > +1 For the next .point releases I think it is good if we didn't take too much water over our heads.
> With that understanding, I think we need to decide if the UI or LDAP > support is higher priority (or if they are equal). If LDAP is as > important as the UI, let's put it in the 1.1 release. If it's not, > let's move it to the backlog or to a 1.2 release (and put off moving > to Lift 2.0 until that point). LDAP support is important. I know we missed a few opportunities last year because we didn't support it, so I would like to keep it in release 1.1 > > Ethan > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I just noticed that "Add LDAP to ESME" is a Jira task tagged for the 1.1 >> release. >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135) >> Then I would say yes let's use the Lift 2.0 snapshot. >> >> On 18. mars 2010, at 05.03, Richard Hirsch wrote: >> >>> 1.1 with UI >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Which release do you refer to as next? >>>> If RC2 I'd say no. >>>> >>>> - anne >>>> >>>> >>>> On 17. mars 2010, at 13.22, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>> >>>>> Do we want to use the 2.0 snapshot for the next release? We would get >>>> LDAP >>>>> support which is now part of the current snapshot? >>>>> >>>>> Maybe someone can try it out in a branch.... >>>>> >>>>> Last time I checked, there were breaking changes... >>>>> >>>>> D. >>>> >>>> >> >>
