I've changed JIRA to reflect this discussion. D.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>wrote: > Let's say that the UI + LDAP + bug fixes are the focus for the next > release. Everything else goes into the backlog. > > D. > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> >> On 18. mars 2010, at 14.21, Ethan Jewett wrote: >> >> > I think we should really limit our focus for Jira items that are in >> > releases. When a JIRA item is included in a release (rather than the >> > backlog), I take that to mean that we will not release until that item >> > is addressed. If we will release without an item being addressed, I >> > think it should stay in the backlog, or be scheduled for a different >> > (future) release. Is that how others understand it? Maybe not :-) >> > >> +1 >> For the next .point releases I think it is good if we didn't take too much >> water over our heads. >> >> > With that understanding, I think we need to decide if the UI or LDAP >> > support is higher priority (or if they are equal). If LDAP is as >> > important as the UI, let's put it in the 1.1 release. If it's not, >> > let's move it to the backlog or to a 1.2 release (and put off moving >> > to Lift 2.0 until that point). >> >> LDAP support is important. >> I know we missed a few opportunities last year because we didn't support >> it, so I would like to keep it in release 1.1 >> > > +1 > >> >> > >> > Ethan >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I just noticed that "Add LDAP to ESME" is a Jira task tagged for the >> 1.1 release. >> >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-135) >> >> Then I would say yes let's use the Lift 2.0 snapshot. >> >> >> >> On 18. mars 2010, at 05.03, Richard Hirsch wrote: >> >> >> >>> 1.1 with UI >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Which release do you refer to as next? >> >>>> If RC2 I'd say no. >> >>>> >> >>>> - anne >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On 17. mars 2010, at 13.22, Richard Hirsch wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Do we want to use the 2.0 snapshot for the next release? We would >> get >> >>>> LDAP >> >>>>> support which is now part of the current snapshot? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Maybe someone can try it out in a branch.... >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Last time I checked, there were breaking changes... >> >>>>> >> >>>>> D. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
