Florian, It looks only some combinations are valid in terms of working counter. Will you analyze the experimental result?
Best regards, Hobin Yoon On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Hobin Yoon <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for the late reply. I have attached log files. > SM0 + SM2: 3/3 (actual / expected) > SM1 + SM2: 3/3 > > Best regards, > Hobin Yoon > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Florian Pose <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:56:39AM +0900, Hobin Yoon wrote: >> > Plz find the attached log file. It is strange that the expected working >> > counter is always 1 when I mapped the PDOs that belong to a SM. >> > >> > SM0, SM1, SM2: 3/5 (actual / expected) >> > SM0: 1/1 >> > SM1: 1/1 >> > SM2: 1/1 >> >> Yes, I forgot, that the LRW datagram is not used, when only inputs or >> only outputs are part of the domain. Please try SM0+SM2 and SM1+SM2, or >> include a second slave, so that the LRW datagram type is used. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Florian Pose >> >> http://etherlab.org >> _______________________________________________ >> etherlab-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users >> > >
_______________________________________________ etherlab-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
