Plz find the attached log file. It is strange that the expected working counter is always 1 when I mapped the PDOs that belong to a SM.
SM0, SM1, SM2: 3/5 (actual / expected) SM0: 1/1 SM1: 1/1 SM2: 1/1 Best regards, Hobin Yoon On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Florian Pose <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 04:12:18PM +0900, Hobin Yoon wrote: > > They all work correctly. I have done input/output on those three SMs. > > > > root@:~# ethercat pdos > > SM0: PhysAddr 0x0f02, DefaultSize 0, ControlRegister 0x44, Enable 9 > > RxPdo 0x1a00 "Byte 0" > > Pdo entry 0x3101:01, 8 bit, "Output" > > SM1: PhysAddr 0x0f03, DefaultSize 0, ControlRegister 0x44, Enable 1 > > RxPdo 0x1a01 "Byte 1" > > Pdo entry 0x3101:02, 8 bit, "Output" > > SM2: PhysAddr 0x1000, DefaultSize 0, ControlRegister 0x00, Enable 1 > > TxPdo 0x1600 "Byte 0" > > Pdo entry 0x3001:01, 8 bit, "Input" > > TxPdo 0x1601 "Byte 1" > > Pdo entry 0x3001:02, 8 bit, "Input" > > > > Does it make any difference if I map only PDOs that belong to a SM at a > > time? > > Yes, it would be interesting to know, which sync manager causes the > incorrect working counter. I guess the result will be that two sync > managers give the correct working counters and one (probably one of the > output SMs) will not increase the working counter. > > -- > Best regards, > Florian Pose > > http://etherlab.org > _______________________________________________ > etherlab-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users >
_______________________________________________ etherlab-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
