Missed the attachments. On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Hobin Yoon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Plz find the attached log file. It is strange that the expected working > counter is always 1 when I mapped the PDOs that belong to a SM. > > SM0, SM1, SM2: 3/5 (actual / expected) > SM0: 1/1 > SM1: 1/1 > SM2: 1/1 > > Best regards, > Hobin Yoon > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Florian Pose <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 04:12:18PM +0900, Hobin Yoon wrote: >> > They all work correctly. I have done input/output on those three SMs. >> > >> > root@:~# ethercat pdos >> > SM0: PhysAddr 0x0f02, DefaultSize 0, ControlRegister 0x44, Enable 9 >> > RxPdo 0x1a00 "Byte 0" >> > Pdo entry 0x3101:01, 8 bit, "Output" >> > SM1: PhysAddr 0x0f03, DefaultSize 0, ControlRegister 0x44, Enable 1 >> > RxPdo 0x1a01 "Byte 1" >> > Pdo entry 0x3101:02, 8 bit, "Output" >> > SM2: PhysAddr 0x1000, DefaultSize 0, ControlRegister 0x00, Enable 1 >> > TxPdo 0x1600 "Byte 0" >> > Pdo entry 0x3001:01, 8 bit, "Input" >> > TxPdo 0x1601 "Byte 1" >> > Pdo entry 0x3001:02, 8 bit, "Input" >> > >> > Does it make any difference if I map only PDOs that belong to a SM at a >> > time? >> >> Yes, it would be interesting to know, which sync manager causes the >> incorrect working counter. I guess the result will be that two sync >> managers give the correct working counters and one (probably one of the >> output SMs) will not increase the working counter. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Florian Pose >> >> http://etherlab.org >> _______________________________________________ >> etherlab-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users >> > >
el9820-sm0-sm1-sm2.log
Description: Binary data
el9820-sm0.log
Description: Binary data
el9820-sm1.log
Description: Binary data
el9820-sm2.log
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ etherlab-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.etherlab.org/mailman/listinfo/etherlab-users
