Here's the URL to the article I quoted, plus the paragraph from the article
itself:

http://www.engadget.com/2015/04/06/stanfords-battery-charges-in-one-minute/

" Unlike earlier aluminum batteries, which generally failed after only about
100 recharge cycles, Stanford's prototype can cycle more than 7,500 times
without any capacity loss -- 7.5 times longer than your average li-ion. The
aluminum-ion cell isn't perfect (yet) as it can only produce about 2 volts,
far less than the 3.6V that lithium-ion an muster. Plus aluminum cells only
carry 40 watts of electricity per kilogram compared to lithium's 100 to 206
W/kg power density."

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cor van de Water
via EV
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 4:29 PM
To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Aluminum battery from Stanford

Actually,
the Nature article quotes 4 Amp per gram, so if a 2V cell weighs 1kg then it
could produce 4,000A or 8kW per kg

The Capacity is quoted as 70mAh per gram, which is 140 Wh per kg (again, at
the expected 2V cell voltage).

Note that all these numbers are the bare cell, so to compare with a CALB
180Ah cell you'd either need to subtract the CALB's housing and connection
hardware weight, or estimate how much it would add to the Alu battery to
make a similar rugged and packaged end product.
By all accounts, it looks like very competitive to Li cells, but all
research takes many years before you can place an order for commercial
available product...
If it is really cheaper, better, safer, then we can see it break through
sooner.
Time will tell.

Cor van de Water
Chief Scientist
Proxim Wireless

office +1 408 383 7626          Skype: cor_van_de_water
XoIP   +31 87 784 1130          private: cvandewater.info
www.proxim.com


This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and
proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation.  If you received
this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any
unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of this
message is prohibited.


-----Original Message-----
From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Dennis via EV
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 2:59 PM
To: 'Electric Vehicle Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Aluminum battery from Stanford

Their current version of the battery has only 40 watts of electricity per
kilogram compared to lithium's 100 to 206 W/kg power density--so you'd need
more of them to get the same power.  That might get better as they improve
the cells, of course.

Bill 

-----Original Message-----
From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Goren via EV
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 2:11 PM
To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: [EVDL] Aluminum battery from Stanford offers safe alternative to
conventional batteries

Does anybody know any more about this research?

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2015/march/aluminum-ion-battery-033115.html 

Aluminum anode; graphite cathode. Unspecified salt for the electrolyte.

It's only about two volts. The rest of the specs are vague...nothing at all
about capacity. They claim super-fast charging times without indicating how
much energy the batteries actually take on. They claim several thousand
charge cycles. No mention of energy density per mass. The prototype is
bendable, in what looks for all the world like a mylar ziploc bag. They show
the battery being drilled into with minimal ill effect.

I find it intriguing to consider for an electric vehicle...because a
super-fast charging time, if real, would similarly imply a super-fast
discharge rate. It gives the appearance of being technology within the reach
of an hobbyist to manufacture. Form factor is obviously quite literally
flexible.

In other words...I can almost imagine building a battery like this, myself,
at home, to put into a car conversion. Or, if it's too heavy for vehicles,
then to stick in the closet to pair with the solar PV array.

Any experts out there have any good water to throw over me?

b&
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to