All hydrogen comes from natural gas. That is a fossil fuel. You are full of
it. Lawrence Rhodes
On Sunday, December 1, 2019, 1:12:42 PM PST, Mark Abramowitz
<[email protected]> wrote:
I don’t believe that government funding of hydrogen or battery zero emission
technologies are a waste - it’s needed to clean the air.
I will refer you to SIP for California to find out why funding has been needed
for battery and fuel cell technologies.
I won’t get into the whether the sizing and scale of EVSE is appropriate,
except to point out that this happens with all technologies.
You are incorrect when you say that hydrogen does not produce greenhouse gas
reductions. The US DOE has run models which show significant reductions, though
those would be US centric. I’m sure Canada has run similar numbers. The problem
is that your assumptions have generally all been incorrect.
Sorry, but I’m sure you will understand when I say that I won’t refer anyone
to your book. I haven’t read it, but if what you’ve peddled here is a taste, I
have a better reputation for providing people with straightforward and accurate
info.
- Mark
Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone
> On Dec 1, 2019, at 7:11 AM, Lawrence Rhodes via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I agree government funding of hydrogen as a fuel is a waste of money.
> Sadly, it's always taxpayer money, because the oil and gas industry
> knows the idea is a loser, so won't pay to develop the technology or
> infrastructure itself. I think that could be the basis of a key
> argument: if hydrogen fuelling is such a great idea, why isn't the
> 'energy' industry paying to build it out themselves? Why is government
> assistance appropriate for this massively expensive build? They didn't
> need government assistance to build gas stations.
>
> In Canada, our federal government is ponying up peanuts now for an
> inter-city charging installation, at exactly the wrong time. They're
> investing in 50 kW stations just as the private sector is ramping up to
> 150 kW stations, with 300 kW on the horizon. And the program that was
> intended for EV charging stations is spending more on hydrogen fuelling
> stations, all under the GHG reductions banner - highly misleading in the
> case of hydrogen made from fossil and fracked natural gas.
>
> If it's any help, you could point legislators' offices to my book. The
> ebook version is just US$6.
>
> https://www.iuniverse.com/en/bookstore/bookdetails/126185-The-Emperor-s-New-Hydrogen-Economy
>
>> On 12/1/2019 8:47 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> 1. California’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program
>> Posted by: "Lawrence Rhodes" [email protected] lawrencerhodes1
>> Date: Sat Nov 30, 2019 1:16 pm ((PST))
>>
>> https://insideevs.com/news/382176/california-amends-cvrp-rebate-program/
>>
>> This new round of incentives favors hydrogen with double the money. This is
>> a horrible waste. If you live in California please contact your
>> assemblyman/senator/govenor and lt. govenor. Maybe mention the hype about
>> hydrogen or other educational articles refuting hydrogen. Our legislators
>> must be educated. Lawrence Rhodes
>
>
>
> --
> Darryl McMahon
> Freelance Project Manager (sustainable systems)
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/index.html
> INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20191202/1589e909/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/index.html
INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
