My view is that if the car originally did not have it enabled?? from the manufacturer, but it was active due to an attempt to entice the owner to pay to enable the feature, Telsa had every right to disable the feature. They have also been known to disable the ability of car that have not been recertified after an accident to use the Supercharger network.
Matthew Pitts On 2/10/2020 2:22 PM, Peri Hartman via EV wrote: > Well, that's probably a legality between the dealer and Tesla. Only if > Tesla did not disclose to the dealer what features would remain could > Tesla be guilty. I'm assuming the dealer knew or was ignorant > (probably the latter). Even if ignorant, that's the dealers fault. > > If it is found that Tesla is changing things that don't accord with an > agreement, then go after them. > > That said, I do think we need to some consumer protection laws so > that, when you buy the car, you aren't signing away future value via > some fine print that you must agree to. > > Peri > > _______________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/index.html INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
