> On 1/12/2024 8:25 PM, EV List Lackey via EV wrote: > > That's been working surprisingly well for him, but that was before the > > unfolding "Cybertruck" disaster. That hideous, awkward, grossly > > inefficient lump belongs in a dystopian SF film, not on the road. If > > he stubbornly carries on with it, it will be Tesla's undoing.
Then John responded - > Yeah, sure. The vehicle with over 2 million pre-orders. > The vehicle that has better specs, and a similar price to comparable EV > trucks. > The vehicle that Tesla will make a profit on - while all other EV trucks are > being > sold at a loss. > Right. Sure that will hurt Tesla. Well said John. Look what happened with the Tesla Plug/Inlet. When Tesla first proposed the NACS everybody said, oh no, CCS is here to stay. The EV manufactures took a look at the total charging system that Tesla had designed and implemented and then decided that NACS was for them So far Ford, General Motors, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Volvo, Polestar, Rivian, Fisker, Honda, Jaguar, Hyundai, BMW, Toyota and two EVSE companies Electrify America and ChargePoint have said that they are going to use the NACS. Rush www.TucsonEV.com _______________________________________________ Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org No other addresses in TO and CC fields HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
