jdd wrote: > Le 11/04/2016 10:40, Axel Braun a écrit : > >> Personally I'm happy with using 13.1 on older hardware, but under the >> above light, maybe it is worth to discuss this again? >> > > may be it's better to support more 13.1?
Given the limited resources, I think that is the right answer, no matter how much I would like to see 13.2 live a long life. > > *every* new release is considered bad and the previous better... Um, 13.2 was/is definitely better than 13.1, the same goes for 12.3 > 12.2 > 12.1. In my opinion/experience. > If one needs really stability for large desktop number, may be it > should go to SLED. > > I'm pretty sure than Leap will be very stable for a very long time. > Now it's 6 month old and the initial problems should have stopped. They _should_ have, but they haven't. In my opinion, Leap421 is not in a state yet where it can be given to grandmum and grandson. (not to mention regular office staff). > Of course it's only my feeling. 13.1 or 13.2 are good only for one > year from now on. I personally expect to move my 13.1 server to Leap > this summer Once things are in production, they live on for much, much longer. Only just this weekend, I was finally able to retire an ancient box still running SuSE Linux 8.2. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (14.6°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - free dynamic DNS, made in Switzerland. _______________________________________________ Evergreen mailing list Evergreen@lists.rosenauer.org http://lists.rosenauer.org/mailman/listinfo/evergreen
