no, no. Dynamic Governance/Sociocracy is 'consenting to' rather than consensus. It allows a cypher to chit away, in the background, rather than actively engage. Look at the nature of the community the two largest proponents live in (Cherry Hill Co-Ho). It shows that it really does not build community. The subscribed organization structure is fair to midlen but the decision making process is exclusionary. One man's opinion (but I'm not alone). With apologies (but earnestness),- -ChadConsultations:Organization Development / Community DevelopmentNetworker-----Original Message----- From: Funda Oral via OSList <[email protected]> To: Michael M Pannwitz <[email protected]>; Diana Larsen <[email protected]>; Tony Budak <[email protected]> Cc: OS LIST 2022 <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, Oct 29, 2022 2:48 am Subject: [OSList] Re: Action Planning in Online/Offline OS 2022
Dear Diana, As far as I understand, Open Space Technology approach is closer to Holacracy "https://www.holacracy.org/"; then to Sociocracy.Hopefully, all these approaches and methods lead to and complete each other for a better collaboration. Have a nice weekend! Funda Michael M Pannwitz via OSList <[email protected]>, 29 Eki 2022 Cmt, 00:45 tarihinde şunu yazdı: Dear Diane, no doubt, different approaches with different unique characteristics do exist. And I assume that co-existance of different approaches with different unique characteristics might be fun and productive. My experience with very large complex systems (such as an entire inner city neighborhood in Berlin) is that they can benefit from different approaches. A future search that took place after a year long planning process produced a variety of projects people were heavily involved in... including close cooperation between diverse groups/interests. Against this background, an OST event that needed just one 3.5 hour Planning Session took place a few months after the Future Search having the characteristics of a "next meeting". And, as you probably remember, the ost event I facilitated for a company with a staff of 35 who work with agile worked fine as usual, including two next meetings in the weeks following the ost event. What I never experienced are hybrids such as an openspace-future search, or an agile-openspace.... I did experience, however, that the yearly gatherings of future search facilitators were conducted in open space (I was part of this in Philadelphia, Stockholm and facilitated one on the Island of Jersey). The future search folks had developed impressive approaches in the aspect of "getting the whole system in the roome". Which meant, that the participants of those Learning Exchanges were not only facilitators but also clients (companies, government agencies, foundations and what have you), researchers, authors... Something we never achieved to any significant extent in our WOSonOS gatherings or the OS Learning Exchanges in Europe. How about our next WOSonOS in Berlin in 12 months? Would be an opportunity of having more divergence and more of the whole system in the room... imagine every one of us attending would bring along one client or other different critters... Wishing us all a weekend of our liking mmp Am 28.10.2022 um 18:57 schrieb Diana Larsen: And the two can co-exist quite nicely, as in Company-wide Agility book by John Buck (sociocracy author) and Jutta Eckstein. | | | | Company-wide Agility with Beyond Budgeting, Open Space & Sociocracy: Survive & Thrive on Disruption smile.amazon.com | | Diana eo.de Michael M Pannwitz Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany +49 30 7728000 [email protected] _______________________________________________ OSList mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ OSList mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ OSList mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
