Marchal wrote > With (classical) comp it exists a level such that we survive a Washington-Moscou self-duplication where > the reconstitution are made at that level (WM).
and later he wrote: > You are scanned read and annihilate at Amsterdam. I reconstitute you > in Washington tomorrow, and at > Moscow in one billion years. Are your expectations different from the > situation where the two reconstitutions are simultaneous. Bruno I fully agree with you in so far the delay is concerned but why do you restrict your reconstitution to the same level? What if you are reconstituted in a virtual level for example? Shouldn't the distribution be invariant for *all levels* and all methods of implementation? If this is true, time is not an objective real entity, but is reduced to a logical linkage between awareness states, with logic, in a recursive fashion, being an emergent property of awareness. Time becomes a first person phenomenon. George
