Thanks to Bruno, I am experiencing a kind of nomenclatorial fusion with Gilles
Henri. I have become Gille Levy. I wonder who George Henri is. :-)
> Jesse Mazer wrote:
> >Are you saying that you support the 2/3 view, meaning that the probability
> >of my "next moment" depends on a kind of integral over all possible future
> Yes. I am less sure than Gille Levy for the precise computation of the
> probability, but I am sure (with the comp hyp.) that my "next moment"
> depends on a kind of integral over all possible histories.
>As Gilles Levy pointed out the efficiency of the UD is not relevant, for
>the sharing space-time emerges from the statistics of the whole set
>of finite and infinite computationnal histories, from the first person
>point of view or first person plural point of view in the case of
>bifurcation of deep computational histories shared by many.