Hi Godfrey:
At 12:03 PM 8/24/2005, you wrote:
Hi Hal,
Just a minimal comment to what you state below.
I erase a bit of the previous exchange.
Godfrey Kurtz
(New Brunswick, NJ)
snip
[GK]
If I understand you correctly your List-of-Everything is pretty much
like our own everything-list (;-)! So it contains YD, CT and AR and also
their negations which makes it self-contradictory a priori and thus
imprevious to any charges of contradiction and in
all likelyhood beyond any argument that anyone may devise (since it
obviously contains it too).
My first assumption says:
"There exists a list of all possible properties of objects that can have
reality."
Are you saying that this list taken as a whole is necessarily self
contradictory and therefore you can not show it does not exist due to this
internal self contradiction and this is your proof that it does not exist?
Let me first point out that the list is just a list - not a system of
logic. I give it only one property by assumption - existence.
Hal Ruhl
