Le 05-nov.-05, à 21:37, Stephen Paul King a écrit :
And it is that timelessness that I am basing my argument against
your
thesis! YOu are ignoring the vast number of arguments that have been
found
in physics and even the reasoning comming from computer science, for
example
the Calude et al work on the non-embeddability of quantum logic into
classical logics. One simply can not obtain quantum logic from
classical
logic without adding postulates to classical logic.
You are right. The postulate I do add is the comp hyp. Then I proof
that the logic of thr true bets (observation) is given by a non boolean
quantum logic.
I ignore, methodologically, the information coming from empirical
physics, because those appearance is what I want to explain.
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
