Le 05-nov.-05, à 21:37, Stephen Paul King a écrit :

And it is that timelessness that I am basing my argument againstyourthesis! YOu are ignoring the vast number of arguments that have beenfoundin physics and even the reasoning comming from computer science, forexamplethe Calude et al work on the non-embeddability of quantum logic intoclassical logics. One simply can not obtain quantum logic fromclassicallogic without adding postulates to classical logic.

`You are right. The postulate I do add is the comp hyp. Then I proof`

`that the logic of thr true bets (observation) is given by a non boolean`

`quantum logic.`

`I ignore, methodologically, the information coming from empirical`

`physics, because those appearance is what I want to explain.`

Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/