Bruno Marchal wrote:

> And read perhaps the literature on the mind body problem: all
> materialist approaches has failed, and then the result I got  explains
> what it should be so.

I have my own analysis of  the problem: the words "map" and "territory"

> Actually you could perhaps explain how do you think a machine is able
> to distinguish a material (physical) reality from an immaterial
> (arithmetical) reality.

The same way I can. What can be thought (logical possibility)
is much broader than what is observed. Therefore, there are
constraints -- matter, laws, etc.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to