Bruno Marchal wrote:


> And read perhaps the literature on the mind body problem: all
> materialist approaches has failed, and then the result I got  explains
> what it should be so.

I have my own analysis of  the problem: the words "map" and "territory"
feature.

> Actually you could perhaps explain how do you think a machine is able
> to distinguish a material (physical) reality from an immaterial
> (arithmetical) reality.

The same way I can. What can be thought (logical possibility)
is much broader than what is observed. Therefore, there are
constraints -- matter, laws, etc.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to