Bruno Marchal wrote:
> And read perhaps the literature on the mind body problem: all > materialist approaches has failed, and then the result I got explains > what it should be so. I have my own analysis of the problem: the words "map" and "territory" feature. > Actually you could perhaps explain how do you think a machine is able > to distinguish a material (physical) reality from an immaterial > (arithmetical) reality. The same way I can. What can be thought (logical possibility) is much broader than what is observed. Therefore, there are constraints -- matter, laws, etc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
