Quentin Anciaux wrote: > Hi Bruno, > > Le jeudi 22 juin 2006 15:59, Bruno Marchal a écrit : > > Dear Stephen,
> Either we have a definition problem or I do not understand. For me relative > computations in platonia are not instantiated by definition as they are in > platonia. Being in platonia just means it exists, hence existence is > sufficient. If not could you please define what you mean by instantiated. Being one of a number (0 <= N <= oo) of possible tokens of a type; existing in a space-time location, in the case og physical instantiation. Instantiation is a one-many relationship. One type, many tokens (instances). In Platonia, there is exactly one of everything. There can also be 0 instances -- non-instantiation. Which neatly solves the Harry Potter/White Rabbuit problem. We do not see WR/HP universes, because we are instantiated and they are not. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
