Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
> Le jeudi 22 juin 2006 15:59, Bruno Marchal a écrit :
> > Dear Stephen,

> Either we have a definition problem or I do not understand. For me relative
> computations in platonia are not instantiated by definition as they are in
> platonia. Being in platonia just means it exists, hence existence is
> sufficient. If not could you please define what you mean by instantiated.

Being one of a number (0 <= N <= oo) of possible tokens of a type;
in a space-time location, in the case og physical instantiation.

Instantiation is a one-many relationship. One type, many tokens

In Platonia, there is exactly one of everything.

There can also be 0 instances -- non-instantiation. Which neatly
solves the Harry Potter/White Rabbuit problem. We do
not see WR/HP universes, because we are instantiated and they
are not.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to